a view of the Marsh

...: Chatter by Year

2016

October

2014

March

February

2013

September

July

June

March

February

January

2012

December

November

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

2011

November

October

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

2010

December

November

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

2009

December

November

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

2008

December

November

October

September

August

...: Chatter by Keyword

ASP.NET

Browsers

Business

Cascading Styles (CSS)

Charity Work

Community

Definitions

Design

Education

Ethics

Firefox

First Post

Hockey

I.T. Events

Internet Explorer

Junk mailer/poster

Life

Microsoft

MS Access

Music

Other sports

Printers

Programming

sci-fi

Software

Speaking/Presentations

SQL

Survey

Teaching

The Marsh

Tips & Tricks

Tools of Trade

U.S. Events

Visual Basic (VB.NET)

Web Design

World Events

...: Marsh Chatter

A Definition: "User" = derogatory

International No sign with Users centered in it.

Yes, that's right! I believe calling someone a " user" is actually an insult and many times is meant to be an insult. If you've spent any time on a helpdesk you know exactly what I mean. The comments "offline" are definitely meant as a negative. Many comics directed at, or about, the technology arena persist this interpretation (e.g. user = dumb). And there is even a line of books which insult people by calling them dumb (although the assumption is, it's not meant negatively - alas, assume is making an… ok not going there).

I formed this opinion "way back" in the 1980's. In fact, I was of the opinion that it was a negative term before that, as a result of its popular use in the 1970's to define "people who use illegal drugs" - hence the negative connotation was built-in even before PC's became popular.

Yes… I am, on the outside of the box, relative to the norms in the Information Technology arena. That's fine… it's OK every now and then, to swing from different trees than the rest of the monkeys!

There are many who argue "for" its usage because it is more general in nature. In fact, I even read content from one person who said "get over it". Alas, not gonna happen here. I refer to groups of people using positive "names" in all cases except for one. See entry on junk mailers/posters.

SO… you say, how do I describe, call, or write about "people who use computers". Well, really now, it's not so hard. I call them my family, my co-workers, my customers, and my friends. If you fall back to using the word "user" - you're taking the easy way out and in the process insulting those around you.

How soon we forget our first day picking up a book about computers and our first tap, tap, tap at the keyboard - yes, even you didn't "get it" at some point. Help the person learn - don't make like you're a gate keeper of all things computing. No matter how you feel about "those people" - without them, our work has no reason to exist! If you find yourself making negative comments and saying "users!" - then you might not be in the right "job" and maybe it's time to seek other employment avenues, not people related.

Change your language to weed out this word and you will find that your marketing content, blog entries, and help content "sounds" much more positive. A side benefit: your attitude changes relative to your interactions with those around you. Go ahead… kick and scream. Say it's too in-grained in the lexicon. Well, it might be… but does that mean you have to jump off the bridge, too?